If the problem isn't solved yet, it's just because you haven't added enough technology yet!
"However, two major discoveries of the twentieth century showed that Laplace's dream of complete prediction is not possible, even in principle...
It was the understanding of chaos that eventually laid to rest the hope of perfect prediction of all complex systems, quantum or otherwise." (Mitchell, 2019, p. 20)
"But even if it were the case that the natural laws had no longer any secret for us, we could still only know the initial situation approximately.
...
it may happen that small differences in the initial conditions produce very great ones in the final phenomenon.
...
Prediction becomes impossible."
(Poincaré, 1908, as cited in Mitchell, 2019, p. 21)
Educational technologies have a long history of failures.
Ed Tech companies promoting new tech:
"This time, things will be different"
"We can be impressed by their performance on some inputs, but there are infinitely many inputs
where they must fail."
- Iris van Rooij (26:02)
Algorithms are brittle - Melanie Mitchell
Humble Requests
Be scientists (curious and reasonably skeptical)
Ask: What does the tech claim to do? Is that useful?
Ask: Does this tech actually do what it claims to do?
Recognize that advertisements are not peer reviewed research
Be ethical educators
Do not give sensitive student data to tech companies
Do not volunteer your students as experimental subjects
Ask: What are the consequences *when* a technology breaks?
AI technologies are contributing to an environment where those "in the know" about how to game these
broken systems have advantages.
Let's play a game!
It's called phisiognomy!
Given a face, you try to guess are they good or bad.
↓
Good!
"He is a person of large vital force and chest capacity; great intellectual power and command of language...
Physically considered, he is a splendid animal"
Bad :(
"Here is a nature that will want to receive money without having to work hard for it...
judging from this picture she has a free and easy style of conduct and not very conscientious as to right and wrong"
Bad :(
"Here is a mouth that looks beastly and the expression of the eyes is anything but pure...
There is little good to be seen in this face; it is indicative of a low, coarse and gross type of character."
Good!
"What a noble countenance, and what a magnificent head in the top part where the moral faculties are located!
... The expression of the eyes is pure, wise and honest."
Good!
"The perceptive faculties are very largely developed in this gentleman. Observe the immense development directly over the nose and eyes, which imparts an observing, knowing, matter-of-fact and practical cast of mind."
Evil!!
"These small, black eyes are insinuating, artful, suggestive and wicked.
The face, though pretty, is mere animal beauty; nothing spiritual about it."
Wicked!!
"This is an artful, evasive, deceitful, lying, immodest and immoral eye; its very expression is suggestive of insincerity and wickedness...
The mouth also has a common and fast look."
Highway robber!
"An unprincipled looking face; the eyes have a sneaky appearance...
The upper part of the forehead in connection with the hair seems to say, I prefer to make my living by my wits..."
Galton coined the term "eugenics" in 1883.
Pearson was a student of Galton's and they worked with Fisher.
The three were pioneers of Statistics, which developed with their attempts to support bigotry on a scientific foundation.
"Wu and Zhang’s sample ‘criminal’ images (top) and ‘non-criminal’ images (bottom)." 2016
To what extent are we training the next generation of pseudoscientists?
To what extent are we training the next generation of pseudoscientists?
Many ethical pitfalls are technical pitfalls.
"Simplistic stereotypes is really not a basis for developing AI, and if your AI is based on this then basically what you're doing is enshrining stereotypes in code." (11:42)
You may wonder:
Are there any consequences of developing and deploying broken technologies into critical decision making scenarios?
↓